Als je die weet te ontketenen, terwijl je de macht in handen hebt, beschik je over alle instrumenten om te bepalen wat dient te gebeuren: economisch, militair, sociaal, cultureel.
Sinds 1945 dragen de Verenigde Staten hun model van vrijheid en democratie wereldwijd uit, het model dat intern al tot grote successen had gevoerd. Elke vorm van verzet werd steeds in de kiem gesmoord. Als grondlegger van de expansiedrift geldt Truman, de man die atoombommen liet neerdalen op onschuldige mensen als proef voor verdere oorlogsmisdaden en in zijn eentje kon bepalen dat het deel van de wereld, waarover de USA (militair en economisch) controle konden uitoefenen, diende ter zelfverrijking van diezelfde USA. Dat lukte wonderwel. Het bewerkstelligde IJzeren Gordijn (niet alleen in Europa) deed de rest.
De Verenigde Staten tonen aan dat een samenleving, primair gebaseerd op concurrentie, bezitsvorming en legitimering van geweld, leidt tot een onrechtstaat, waarin het recht van de sterkste geldt, ook al staat in haar constitutie het tegendeel. Ze zal als staat internationaal opereren volgens hetzelfde ideologische stramien waarmee ze op haar eigen territorium zoveel succes heeft geboekt. Ze voelt zich volledig onaantastbaar, zeker in de hoofden van de gezagsdragers, en dus onberekenbaar en is niet meer tot het afleggen van verantwoording te bewegen. Een schamele man, die het tot president geschopt heeft, niet door kunde maar door geld, getuigt hiervan. War On Terror heet zijn devies.
U.S.: ‘HAGUE INVASION ACT’ BECOMES LAW
White House
A new law supposedly protecting U.S. servicemembers from the International Criminal Court shows that the Bush administration will stop at nothing in its campaign against the court.
U.S. President George Bush today signed into law the American Servicemembers Protection Act of 2002, which is intended to intimidate countries that ratify the treaty for the International Criminal Court (ICC). The new law authorizes the use of military force to liberate any American or citizen of a U.S.-allied country being held by the court, which is located in The Hague. This provision, dubbed the “Hague invasion clause,” has caused a strong reaction from U.S. allies around the world, particularly in the Netherlands.
In addition, the law provides for the withdrawal of U.S. military assistance from countries ratifying the ICC treaty, and restricts U.S. participation in United Nations peacekeeping unless the United States obtains immunity from prosecution. At the same time, these provisions can be waived by the president on “national interest” grounds.
“The states that have ratified this treaty are trying to strengthen the rule of law,” said Richard Dicker, director of the International Justice Program at Human Rights Watch. “The Bush administration is trying to punish them for that.”
Dicker pointed out that many of the ICC’s biggest supporters are fragile democracies and countries emerging from human rights crises, such as Sierra Leone, Argentina and Fiji.
The law is part of a multi-pronged U.S. effort against the International Criminal Court. On May 6, in an unprecedented move, the Bush administration announced it was “renouncing” U.S. signature on the treaty. In June, the administration vetoed continuation of the U.N. peacekeeping force in Bosnia in an effort to obtain permanent immunity for U.N. peacekeepers. In July, U.S. officials launched a campaign around the world to obtain bilateral agreements that would grant immunity for Americans from the court’s authority. Yesterday, Washington announced that it obtained such an agreement from Romania.
However, another provision of the bill allows the United States to assist international efforts to bring to justice those accused of genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity – including efforts by the ICC.
“The administration never misses an opportunity to gratuitously antagonize its allies on the ICC,” said Dicker. “But it’s also true that the new law has more loopholes than a block of Swiss cheese.”
Dicker said the law gives the administration discretion to override ASPA’s noxious effects on a case-by-case basis. Washington may try to use this to strong-arm additional concessions from the states that support the court, but Dicker urged states supporting the ICC “not to fall into the U.S. trap: the law does not require any punitive measures.”
Human Rights Watch believes the International Criminal Court has the potential to be the most important human rights institution created in 50 years, and urged regional groups of states, such as the European Union, to condemn the new law and resist Washington’s attempts to obtain bilateral exemption arrangements.
The law formed part of the 2002 Supplemental Appropriations Act for Further Recovery from and Response to Terrorist Attacks on the United States.
Bron: HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH – 3 augustus 2002
2022
Het lachen vergaat je, niet voor zijn toehoorders.
Update 29 januari 2023
-
DE WERELD WORDT EEN AMERIKAANS PARADIJS
-
TORTUUR
-
THE RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR
-
POLITIEKE GEVANGENEN
-
SCHAAMTE EN SCHULD
-
WAR ON TERROR: EEN DAVEREND SUCCES
Uitgelicht: bron
